Realizing Restorative Justice through Mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v2i2.143Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Mediation, Dispute Resolution, Legal Alternatives, Mediator RoleAbstract
Disputes can arise at any time in human life, unwanted and unexpected by anyone. Ideally, law enforcement can realize the objectives of the law, namely justice, benefit, and legal certainty. The settlement is often done through legal channels, and the most recognized by the public is dispute resolution through the courts, which usually takes a long time and is expensive. Mediation can be used as an alternative in dispute resolution because it can be done either inside or outside the court so that it can realize restorative justice. The purpose of this training is for each community to understand alternative ways to resolve various disputes through mediation, which is the right way to resolve legal issues without going to court. The outputs of this activity are 1) Knowing the role of the mediator and 2) Understanding the mediation process. 3) Improve skills to become a competent mediator.
Downloads
References
Auerbach, J. S. (2000). Justice without law? Oxford University Press.
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2013). Law and social theory. Hart Publishing.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, W. (2006). Cultures of mediation: Making mediation work. University of California Press.
Cotterrell, R. (2003). Law's community: Legal theory in sociological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's empire. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Epstein, L., & King, G. (2002). The rules of inference. University of Chicago Law Review, 69(1), 1-133.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. Yale University Press.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., & Rogers, N. H. (1999). Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, and other processes (4th ed.). Aspen Law & Business.
Hutchinson, T. (2019). Researching and writing in law (4th ed.). Thomson Reuters.
Indonesian Police. (2021). Regulation No. 8 of 2021.
Johnstone, G. (2002). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. UCLA Law Review, 31(4), 754-842.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). Mediation and the “culture of reconciliation”. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 70, 15-26.
Mnookin, R. H., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88(5), 950-997.
Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Five minutes of legal philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13-15.
Riskin, L. L., & Westbrook, J. E. (1987). Dispute resolution and lawyers. West Publishing Co.
Sarat, A., & Simon, J. (2004). Beyond legal realism? Cultural analysis, cultural studies, and the situation of legal scholarship. Yale Law Journal, 113(3), 577-617.
Strang, H., & Braithwaite, J. (Eds.). (2001). Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge University Press.
Supreme Court of Indonesia. (2016). Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on mediation procedures in courts.
Syahrizal Abbas. (2009). Mediasi dan Arbitrase. Rajawali Press.
Twining, W. (2006). General jurisprudence: Understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Herald Press.
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nasrah Hasmiati Attas, Nasrah Hasmiati Attas, Citra Nasir, Tri Eka Saputra, Abbas Gilang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by JISSR prior to the publication
