Effectiveness of Records Management in Public Service Delivery: Evidence from a Secondary Data Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v6i2.309Keywords:
records management, public service delivery, archives, accountability, transparencyAbstract
Effective records management is a core administrative capability because public services depend on the timely availability, authenticity, traceability, and security of information generated through government transactions. This study examines how records management contributes to public service effectiveness using secondary data only. An integrative document review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies, international standards, Indonesian legislation, and official archival policy documents. Sixteen substantive sources were purposively retained because they directly addressed records management, public-sector service delivery, accountability, transparency, or electronic records management. The material was coded thematically around service timeliness and retrieval, accuracy and evidentiary reliability, accountability and transparency, digital integration, and organizational capacity. The review shows that records management improves public service delivery primarily by reducing information-search delays, supporting consistent decisions, preserving evidence of administrative actions, strengthening access to information, and enabling continuity across organizational units. However, digitization alone does not guarantee effectiveness. Recurrent constraints include weak classification and retention controls, fragmented paper-digital workflows, limited professional capacity, inadequate infrastructure, weak management support, and incomplete compliance with archival rules. The Indonesian policy context provides a strong formal basis through Law No. 43 of 2009 on Archives, Law No. 25 of 2009 on Public Services, and the SRIKANDI integrated electronic records system, but implementation effectiveness depends on embedding records controls into day-to-day service processes. The study concludes that records management should be treated as service infrastructure rather than a back-office administrative function.Downloads
References
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2026). Layanan Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Dinamis Terintegrasi (SRIKANDI). https://anri.go.id/layanan-publik/layanan-srikandi
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Casadesus de Mingo, A., & Cerrillo-i-Martinez, A. (2018). Improving records management to promote transparency and prevent corruption. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 256-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.005
International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO.
Kashaija, L. S., Chacha, P. J., Ngudungi, C. C., & Dutu, S. G. (2024). Records management programme towards good governance and service delivery in Singida Local Authorities, Tanzania. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 57(1), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsasa.v57i1.3
Kemoni, H., & Ngulube, P. (2008). Relationship between records management, public service delivery and the attainment of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals in Kenya. Information Development, 24(4), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666908098074
Luyombya, D., Sendikadiwa, E., & Mulindwa, E. (2026). Examining archives management practices and service delivery in Mpigi district local government in Uganda. Information Development, 42(1), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231209958
Maina, G. K. (2022). The state of records management and service delivery in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 40(4), Article 11553. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/11553
Matlala, M. E., & Ncube, T. R. (2025). Electronic records management amidst the seismic shift in the dynamic infosphere. Records Management Journal, 35(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2023-0022
Mutula, S., & Wamukoya, J. M. (2009). Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: Implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government. International Journal of Information Management, 29(5), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.04.004
Praja, M. E. I., Siraj, M. L., Asis, D., & Suprianto, S. (2026). Records management system at the South Sulawesi Provincial Educational Quality Assurance Institution. JURNAP: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.65943/n19jpn63
Putranto, W. A., Nareswari, A., & Karomah, K. (2018). Electronic records management in administrative process: Readiness and practice. Jurnal Kearsipan, 13(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.46836/jk.v13i1.40
Republic of Indonesia. (2009a). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives (Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan).
Republic of Indonesia. (2009b). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services (Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik).
Rutta, M., & Ndenje-Sichalwe, E. (2022). The state of records management practices in public offices: A case of Kinondoni Municipal Council in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 16(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.4314/udslj.v16i2.15
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., & Flinn, A. (2010). Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.008
Shonhe, L., & Grand, B. (2018). A service delivery improvement strategy for a records management programme. ESARBICA Journal, 37, 195-220.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indah Sri Andini, Abdul Sahid, Ambo Masse

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Authors retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The published work is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). This license permits others to share and adapt the work, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal as the initial publisher.
- Authors may establish separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of their published work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book), as long as they acknowledge its original publication in this journal.
- Authors must sign a copyright transfer agreement once they have reviewed and approved the final proof provided by JISSR before publication.







